A fraught UN summit wrapped up on Sunday with a landmark deal on funding to help vulnerable countries cope with devastating climate impacts—but also anger boiled over a failure to be more ambitious on cutting emissions.
The two-week talks in Egypt’s Red Sea resort of Sharm el-Sheikh, which at times appeared to teeter on the brink of collapse, delivered a major breakthrough on a fund for climate “loss and damage” at dawn on Sunday.
Pakistan welcomed the historic decision of the 27th summit of the United Nations Conference of Parties (COP27) for establishing the fund, terming it momentous achievement, especially for the Group of 77 (G77) countries, who were pressing for such a measure for the past three decades.
“We have struggled for 30 years on this path, and today in Sharm el-Sheikh this journey has achieved its first positive milestone,” Pakistan’s Climate Minister Sherry Rehman told the summit. COP27 “responded to the voices of the vulnerable”.
Tired delegates applauded when the fund was adopted as the sun came up on Sunday, following almost two extra days of round-the-clock negotiations. But jubilation over that achievement was countered by stern warnings.
UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres said the talks had “taken an important step towards justice” with the loss and damage fund, but fell short in pushing for the urgent carbon-cutting needed to tackle the global warming.
British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak also warned that “more must be done”, while French President Emmanuel Macron proposed another summit in Paris ahead of COP28 in Dubai to agree “a new financial pact” for vulnerable nations.
A final COP27 statement covering the broad efforts to grapple with a warming planet held the line on the aspirational goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius from preindustrial levels.
It also included the language on renewable energy for the first time, while reiterating previous calls to accelerate “efforts towards the phase-down of unabated coal power and phase-out of inefficient fossil fuel subsidies”.
European Commission Vice President Frans Timmermans said the EU was “disappointed”, adding that more than 80 nations had backed a stronger emissions pledge. “What we have in front of us… doesn’t bring enough added efforts from major emitters to increase and accelerate their emission cuts,” said Timmermans.
The deal on loss and damage gathered critical momentum during the talks. The COP27 chair, Egyptian Foreign Minister Sameh Shoukry, said any missteps were “not intentional”, and that he worked to avoid any “backslide” by parties.
With around 1.2C of warming so far, the world has seen a cascade of climate-driven extremes, shining a spotlight on the plight of developing countries faced with escalating disasters, as well as an energy and food price crisis and debt.
The fund will be geared towards developing nations “that are particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change”—language that had been requested by the EU.
The Europeans had also wanted to broaden the funder base to cough up cash. The final loss and damage text left many of the thornier questions to be dealt with by a transitional committee, which will report to next year’s climate meeting in Dubai to get the funding operational.
The fund will focus on what can be done now to support loss and damage resources but the agreement does not provide for liability or compensation, said a US State Department spokesperson.
The establishment of the fund is seen as major diplomatic achievement of Pakistan which, as chair of the Group of 77 and China, galvanized international support for not only placing the issue on the agenda of the talks in in Egypt, but also pushed for a consensus agreement.
The Foreign Office said in a statement that the consensus decision taken to this effect by the COP27 in Egypt was a momentous achievement, especially for the Group of 77 and China, as the developing countries had been demanding such a fund for the past 30 years.
“Pakistan welcomes the establishment of a fund to address loss and damage caused by climate-induced disasters,” the Foreign Office said in a statement. “The developing countries have been demanding such a fund for the past 30 years,” the statement added.
Referring to the catastrophic climate-induced floods in Pakistan that resulted in damages of over $30 billion, the Foreign Office expressed the hope for an early operationalization of the fund to bridge a major gap in the climate finance architecture. (Sourced from the Express Tribune)